|
|
3.0 Construction
SECTION 3.0 CONSTRUCTION3.1 Contractor Selection | 3.1.03 Pre-Qualification of Contractors | | David Gilmore, LPA, Inc. | March 2003 | 7 pages | | This presentation discusses the advantages and disadvantages of pre-qualification.
| | 3.1.02 Pre-Qualification of Bidders | | Sally D. Robinson, Bowie, Arneson, Wiles and Giannone | March 2003 | 21 pages | | This presentation covers legal authorization, a system of rating, timelines, confidentiality, DIR and design-build, disqualification, financial documents, notification, records, board policy and staffing.
| | 3.1.01 Pre Qualification of Bidders | | Linda Sweaney, Office of the San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools | October 2002 | 4 pages | | This presentation includes sample pre-qualification language to be inserted in notice of inviting bid and a sample form for use in evaluating the contractor’s previous performance. It also discusses the basis for disqualification, establishing financial capacity, and timelines.
|
3.2 Bidding Process | 3.2.28 Preparation of Bid Documents and Advertising and Opening Bids | | Rob Pierce, Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District | January 2007 | | | This comprehensive report includes document preparation, advertising, opening and awarding bids, a bid proposal form, a contract, and a notice inviting bids.
| | 3.2.27 Bid Preparation and Contrast Changes, The Human Side of Managing Risk | | Jeff Doyle, Rainforth Grau Architects and Paul Martin, Lionakis Beaumont Design Group | January 2007 | | | The following aspects of bidding discussed here include: Legal requirements, pre-bid activities and documents, awarding the bid, communication problems and change orders.
| | 3.2.26 Contract Changes and Close-Out | | Roland Skumawitz, Romoland School District; Terry Tao, Atkinson-Andelson-Loya-Ruud and Romo; Charlene Yarnall, PJHM Architects, Inc. | May 2006 | | | This presentation discusses change orders, including their causes and origins, how to process them, and how to prevent them. The presentation also describes: (1) the laws that apply to project close-out, including the architect’s responsibilities and DSA close-out requirements; (2) close-out points of reference; and (3) lessons learned.
| | 3.2.25 Opening and Awarding Bids and Resolving Bid Protests | | Mark Kelley, Miller, Brown and Dannis; Don Lussier, Corona-Norco Unified School District; Ed Mierau, Neff Construction; Chris Taylor, HMC Architects | May 2006 | | | This presentation describes various scenarios for awarding bids and resolving bid protests.
| | 3.2.24 Preparing Bid Documents | | Teri Jones, Sundt Construction; Mikal Nicholls, Sweetwater Union High School District; Mark Williams, Atkinson-Andelson-Loya-Ruud & Romo | May 2006 | | | This presentation defines what bid documents are, why they are important, who prepares them, and how various delivery methods affect them. The presentation also includes a front end document sample checklist and a list of front end documents that are typically affected by delivery method.
| | 3.2.23 Extreme Makeover – School Facility Edition: How To Attract Qualified Bidders | | Margie Brown, San Ramon Valley Unified School District; Cheri Love, Public Construction Law; Ron Lebs, Sylvan Unified School District; Bob Brayton, CT Brayton and Sons | February 2006 | | | This presentation discusses the elements of a qualified bidder, including relationship dynamics and attributes that make a potential bidder “attractive.”
| | 3.2.22 Have You Ever Read Your Bid Docs? | | Hugh Lee, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud, and Romo; Douglas Yeoman, Parker and Covert LLP | February 2006 | | | This presentation illustrates some of the “less than intelligent” things the bid docs sometimes say.
| | 3.2.21 Protecting Yourself and Your District in the Use of Piggyback Contracts | | David Huff and Sima Salek, Orbach, Huff and Suarez LLP | June 2005 | | | This presentation describes how to protect yourself and your district in the use of piggyback contracts through emphasis on performance bonds and payment bonds with follow-up front-end documents. | | 3.2.20 Identification of the Problem: The High Bid Environment | | Stephanie Gonos, School Advisory Services | July 2004 | 4 pages | | This presentation discusses the results of a field survey conducted by C.A.S.H. on the high bid environment. It also features a case study from the Capistrano Unified School District on re-use of plans from an elementary school.
| | 3.2.19 Planning for Schools of the Future | | Gaylaird Christopher, Perkins and Will Architects and Priscilla Wohlstetter, University of Southern California | March 2001 | 4 pages | | The presentation provides several examples of school facilities that demonstrate qualities important to the learning environment. The learning environment must be flexible and adaptive to respond to the needs of the students. It must accommodate lectures, allow students to work in small groups, and contain the amenities necessary for students to do experiments, artwork and build models of their projects.
| | 3.2.18b Construction Litigation Issues | | Cheri Love, Public Construction Law, and Henry Petrino, Davis Joint USD | June 2004 | 6 pages | | This comprehensive presentation describes how to keep construction. Projects on track and out of litigation from the very beginning. Included are such topics as prequalification, bid alternatives, substitution of materials, pre-bid site visits and conferences, bid irregularities, withdrawal of bids after opening, issuance of the notice to proceed, and substitution of subcontractor.
| | 3.2.18a Construction Litigation Issues | | Cheri Love, Public Construction Law and Henry Petrino, Davis Joint USD | June 2004 | 16 pages | | This comprehensive presentation describes how to keep construction projects on track and out of litigation from the very beginning and addresses such topics as: prequalification, bid alternatives, substitution of materials, pre-bid site visits and conferences, bid irregularities, withdrawal of bids after opening, issuance of the notice to proceed, and substitution of subcontractor.
| | 3.2.17 Pre-Construction Procedures | | Gregory Bergman, Bergman and Dacey, Inc., and Craig Misso, Ontario-Montclair School District | June 2004 | 3 pages | | This presentation provides an overview of selected issues, including risk management, prequalification, bid alternates, and substitution of materials and of subcontractors. Also discussed are the pre-bid site visit and conference, bid irregularities, withdrawal of bids after opening, and issuance of notice to proceed.
| | 3.2.16 Bidding Procedures | | Sally Robinson, Bowie, Arneson, Wiles, and Giannone | March 2003 | 15 pages | | This presentation features a legal update on current bid requirements, including the LCP, a pre-job conference checklist, exemptions, design-build contracts, sole source, timelines, bonding alternative bidding procedures, leaseback method, internet utilization, protests and non-responsive bids.
| | 3.2.15 Guidance of Bid Evaluation/Recommendation For Award | | Erickson-Hall Construction Company | March 2003 | 12 pages | | This report emphasizes the importance of bid evaluation and addresses topics such as when to recommend an award, the definition of a bid evaluation, technical review, reference review, inclusion review, protests, and anonymous phone calls.
| | 3.2.14 Understanding the Bid Climate | | David Gilmore, LPA, Inc. | March, 2003 | 13 pages | | The importance of understanding the current economic environment in California is stressed in this presentation. It deals with the multi regions, status of private work, out of state competition, regional differences and bid cycles.
| | 3.2.13 Understanding the Bid Climate | | Kris M. Meyer, Ledesma and Meyer Construction Company | March 2003 | 13 pages | | This presentation explains how to assess the bid climate, its importance, how to increase competition on your project, and what constitutes normal and abnormal conditions.
| | 3.2.12 How to Survive Public Bidding in Difficult Times | | Janet Dixon, Riverside USD; Ed Mierau, Neff Construction Inc.; and Harold Freeman, Lozano Smith LLP | February 2003 | 26 pages | | Various bidding issues are presented here, including prequalification of bidders, procedures, experts, advertising, bid evaluation, surety insurer and certification of labor compliance (LCP).
| | 3.2.11 Bidding and Contract Issues From A to Z | | Peggy Strand, Best Best and Krieger LLP | January 2003 | 12 pages | | Bid documents; bid evaluation; protests and award; subcontractor substitution; labor compliance; change orders and claims; stop notice; problems; closeout and payments are all dealt with in this presentation.
| | 3.2.10 Assessing the Bid Climate | | Eduardo Escobedo, Pacific Program Management | October 2002 | 4 pages | | This presentation discusses assessing the local and neighboring community, construction activities, as well as construction building and material cost indices.
| | 3.2.09 Tasks/Issues to Determine During the Design Process | | Dana LeSher, Pacific Program Management, Inc. | October 2002 | 6 pages | | This presentation includes a list of topics that are resolved during the design process and included in the bid package. It also outlines components of the bidding process such as marketing, pre-bid meeting and agenda, bid opening, and pre-construction meeting agendas.
| | 3.2.08 Update on Competitive Bidding Requirements | | Steve Hartsell, Associate General Counsel, School and College Legal Services of California | October 2002 | 2 pages | | The presenter describes when bidding is required, the rules to follow and the latest legislative changes.
| | 3.2.07 Responsibility of Owners Team | | Sherry Gongaware, Associate Director of Facilities, Tracy Unified School District | October, 2002 | 2 pages | | The following has been selected from the presentation which was based on the School District’s Manual for bidding:
Table of Contents
Business services Memo to the Superintendent
Additive/deductive Bid Alternates
| | 3.2.06 Structuring Your Bid Package | | David Gilmore, LPA, Inc. | March 2003 | 9 pages | | This presentation includes the importance of the structuring of projects, the delivery system, bid alternates, cost estimates and legal issues when determining low bidders.
| | 3.2.05 Avoiding Risk and Saving Money on Your Modernization Project | | Barbara Gadbois, Gibbs, Giden, Locher & Turner, LLP;Chris Lawrence, HMC Architects; Craig Misso, Ontario-Montclair School District | February 2002 | 16 pages | | This presentation outlines the steps involved in the planning, bidding, construction administration, and project closeout phases of construction.
| | 3.2.04 Avoiding Public Construction Contract Problems | | Marilyn Cleveland, Miller Brown and Dannis | September 2001 | | | Prequalification of bidders, competitive bidding, advertising for bids, evaluation of bids, bid protests, claims for delay, contractors' claims, district claims and stop notices are all included in this presentation.
| | 3.2.03 Surviving Public Bidding | | Terry Tao, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo and Ed Mierau, Neff Construction | March 2001 | | | The presentation includes Bid Irregularities/Errors, Bidder Relief, Subcontractor Listing Errors, Addenda Issuance, Advertisements, Prevailing Wage, Licensing, Bid Climate, and Bid Strategies.
| | 3.2.02 Informal Bidding of Projects Less Than $75,000 | | Sharon Suarez, Esq., Wong & Suarez | November 2000 | | | Pursuant to Public contract Code 22030 et seq., by adopting construction cost accounting standards promulgated by the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Commission, local agencies, including school districts, may award contracts for “public projects” work up to $75,000 without engaging in a formal bidding process.
| | 3.2.01 California Public Contract Code, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 3400 | | California Public Contract Code | | Link to the code on the Internet | | California Public Contract Code, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 3400.
This section of the Code provides necessary information on bidding.
|
3.3 Construction Management | 3.3.24 Commissioning | | James Becker, WCS/ca | July 2007 | | | This presentation defines commissioning and outlines its benefits; discusses the various phases of commissioning and outlines its benefits; discusses the various phases of commissioning; presents commissioning options; discusses the cost of commission; defines the three levels of commissioning (abbreviated, standard, and comprehensive); and includes commissioning quality examples.
| | 3.3.23 The CM Perspective: Elements of Project Management | | Kurt Weidmann, Harris and Associates and Terry Street, Roebbelen Contracting | January 2007 | | | The construction management role and functions are described here including: the preconstruction phase, managing the project, project documentation, sub/trade contractor management and closeout.
| | 3.3.22 Legal Issues – Bid Protests | | Phil Henderson and Glenn Gould, Miller Brown and Dannis | January 2007 | | | How to deal with the lowest responsive/responsible bidder, the time for filing, protest, due process and district options are presented here.
| | 3.3.21 Legal Issues – Subcontractor | | Phil Henderson and Glenn Gould, Miller Brown and Dannis | January 2007 | | | This presentation covers subcontractor substitutions, district responsibilities, surety involvement and communications.
| | 3.3.20 The LEA Perspective: Terminating a Contractor | | Don Yamagata, Montebello Unified School District | January 2007 | | | The warning signs of problems with a contractor are presented. Suggestions for legal assistance, communications, surety, options, decisions and completions of the project are provided.
| | 3.3.19 Project Certification | | Dennis Bellet, DSA | June 2006 | | | This presentation uses two case studies to describe the DSA certification process.
| | 3.3.18 Remedies For Contractor Failures | | Ed Mierau, Neff Construction; Rick Levesque, The Hartford; and Phil Henderson, Miller Brown and Dannis | February 2006 | | | This overview of remedies for contractor failure includes:
• The warning signs of potential contractor failure
• Deciding when and how to default the contractor
• What you are likely to hear from the surety
• What you are likely to hear from your attorney
• What you are likely to hear from your construction manager
• Dealing effectively with sureties: strategies for success
| | 3.3.17 The Effective Use of Construction Management Services | | Terry Bradley, Clovis USD; Jerome Behrens, Lozano Smith LLP; Edwin Darden Jr.,Edwin S. Darden Associates Inc., Tim Marsh, Harris Construction; Walt Byrd, Clovis USD | February 2005 | 10 pages | | Sample language for bid packages, project schedule in contract documents, and references for further readings are provided in this document.
| | 3.3.16 Your Contractor Can't Perform, Now What? | | Wendy Wiles, Bowie Arneson Wiles and Giannone, and Sandra Packham, Hemet USD | October 2004 | 8 pages | | This presentation discusses how to monitor your construction project, including: warning signs to be aware of in construction, steps to take to avoid termination, procedural issues in defaulting a contractor, steps to take prior to termination, options in terminating a contractor, what to do if your contractor files bankruptcy, and recommended actions to minimize risk from defaulting contractors.
| | 3.3.15 Agency Construction Management – Delivery Method | | Dana LeSher, Harris and Associates and Tony Lief, FL Construction Management | May 2004 | 4 pages | | This presentation lists the factors that influence the selection of a delivery system and the pros and cons of Agency/CM and CM Multi-Prime/Trade Contracting.
| | 3.3.14 Construction Management At-Risk | | Mark Mardock, McCarthy Building Companies and Eric Stenman, Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. | May 2004 | 3 pages | | This presentation defines CM At-Risk and discusses the legal framework and pros and cons of utilizing it as a project delivery method.
| | 3.3.13 Agency Construction Management – Legal Framework | | Paula de Sousa, Best Best and Krieger, LLP | May 2004 | 4 pages | | Included here are the hiring of a CM under Government Code 4525 and the role and duties of a CM including fee arrangements.
| | 3.3.12b Construction 101/201 | | Don Lussier, Corona-Norco USD | February 2004 | 28 pages | | B. Construction 201
This presentation includes pre-qualifications and documents, rating criteria, team building, scheduling, claims, critical path analysis, change orders, inefficiency and damage analysis.
| | 3.3.12a Construction 101/201 | | Don Lussier, Corona-Norco USD | February 2004 | 24 pages | | A. Construction 101
The legal framework behind the selection of a project team are discussed here. It includes managing, savings, preventive measures, bidding, payments and budgeting. | | 3.3.11 Reaching Closure: Effective Project Completion and Closeout | | Laura Lee Briggs, Meyers/Nave; Patti Cummings, Paramount USD; Stella Doiron, PC Associates; Gerald Freeman, DSA; Carrie Matsumoto, Norwalk-La Mirada USD; and Ben Reyes, Meyes/Nave | February 2004 | 16 pages | | This presentation provides an overview of a typical school construction project and addresses the following completion/closeout issues: legal completion and closeout requirements, DSA final certification requirements, OPSC 50-06 and expenditure audits, and project organization and accounting tools. | | 3.3.10 Project Management in Cyberspace II | | Kimon Onuma AIA, Webscape Digital Architecture, William Schmidt, Palm Springs USD | February 2003 | 10 pages | | This presentation shows how a district developed a website dedicated to a school building project that provides community access and project management.
| | 3.3.09 ACCM Construction Management RFQ/RFP Guidelines | | Association of California Construction Managers (ACCM) | February 2003 | 7 pages | | These guidelines are flexible yet cover the essential items, such as project description, qualifications and proposed services. A sample school district cover letter is included.
| | 3.3.08 Project Management In Cyberspace | | David Bautista and Ray Pas, Seville Group, Inc. | February 2002 | 20 pages | | This workshop discussed how information such as budgets, design options, construction issues, and user requirements can be tracked and delegated by the owner, architect, contractor and administrators. Information sharing can be seamless, secure and help a project move forward.
| | 3.3.07 Summary Outline of Rules Governing Procurement of Architectural Services by School Districts | | Kevin Collins, Weston, Benshoof, Rochefort, Rubalcava, MacCuish, LLP | August 2001 | | | California Senate Bill 50, passed in 1998, defines the rules applicable to California school districts when procuring architectural and engineering services. This paper deals with these rules.
| | 3.3.06 Consultant Selection Process – Conducting the Interview | | Maria Leyva, Pacific Program Management, Inc. | August 2001 | | | Items covered in this presentation include preparation for conducting the interview and streamlining the process.
| | 3.3.05 Top Ten Ways to Screw Up a Construction Project | | Mark Kelly, Miller Brown and Dannis; Brian Torone, Torone Construction Consulting | March 2001 | 23 pages | | The ten way to screw up a construction project are presented in this Power Point presentation in a straight forward manner with suggested solutions for each problem. Discussions center around the facilities manager not having sufficient time, enough staff, inadequate money, etc. | | 3.3.04 Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board | | Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board | | Link to Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board website | | Information on school construction safety standards can be found at this site.
| | 3.3.03 Constructability Reviews, Appendix 11 of Educational Specifications: Linking Design of School Facilities to the Educational Program | | CDE/School Facilities Planning Division (SFPD) | | Must Purchase from CDE/School Facilities Planning Division (SFPD) website | | This document describes why constructability review of project contract documents is a recommended practice. Pages 99-102
This first publication in the series is designed to help school districts develop specifications based on a fundamental principle of modern architecture; that is, form follows function. The document includes a definition of specifications, suggested procedures, and a model format.
(120pp.) Item No. 1352 - $18.50
| | 3.3.02 Pre-Construction Meeting Project Checklist | | Riverside Unified School District, Operations Division | | 2 pages | | | 3.3.01 Construction Management Delivery Systems | | Vanir Construction Management, Inc. | February 2000 | | | This presentation outlines the various construction management systems available to districts.
|
3.4 District Functions | 3.4.31 Storm Water Management Plans | | Ron Collins, Harris and Associates | July 2005 | | | The history of storm water management plans (SWMP), the law, minimum criteria measures, designated MS4’s, and cost projections are defined.
| | 3.4.30 Defining the Problems | | Tom Duffy, Murdoch, Walrath and Holmes; Bill Meehleis, Modular Buildings, Inc.; Steve Cirvelli, Meehleis Modular Buildings, Inc. | June 2005 | | | This presentation includes the legal history of modulars and piggyback contracts and includes a piggyback flowchart. | | 3.4.29 Insurance Companies and Other Entities | | | | | This website provides a listing of Fidelity\Surety companies identified by state. As presented by Mike Henning of Mobile Modular at the June 2005 Piggyback Workshop, it is recommended that school districts accept only those fidelity\surety companies that are California admitted carriers. | | 3.4.28 Litigation and Remedies | | Jerry Behrens, Lozano Smith | June 2004 | 10 pages | | Problems such as: delay analysis, false claims, methods of proving damages, and dispute resolution procedures are dealt with here.
| | 3.4.27 Poor Performance During Construction | | Mark Kelley, Miller, Brown and Dannis; and Terry T. Tao AIA, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud and Romo | June 2004 | 9 pages | | What to do with an underperforming contractor is described here including non-performance and utilization of a surety bond.
| | 3.4.26 Bonds, Guarantees and Warranties | | Wendy Wiles, Bowie, Arneson, Wiles and Giannone | June 2004 | 4 pages | | This presentation provides information regarding the following bonds, guarantees, and warranties issues: notification to surety, contract/bond language, termination, substantial performance, takeover agreement, completion contractor, and important considerations. | | 3.4.25 School District Construction Law | | Gregory M. Bergman, Esq. and Paul V. Rayburn, Esq., Bergman and Dacey Inc. | June 2004 | 11 pages | | This is a primer on bonds, insurance and warranties and how districts can protect themselves in the construction process.
| | 3.4.24 From Concept To Close Out: Managing the Numbers | | Lettie Boggs, Colbi Technologies, Inc. | May 2004 | 5 pages | | This comprehensive presentation includes project demographics and eligibility, estimates, money management, record-keeping and audit preparation.
| | 3.4.23 “Modernization Logistics and Disruptions – Stop Reacting and Start Managing | | Janet Dixon, Riverside USD; Kevin Wilkeson, HMC Architects; Ed Mierau, Neff Construction Co.; Steve Worley, Tilden Coil Constructors Inc. | February 2004 | 13 pages | | Topics included here are the importance of district “standards,” effective construction administration, project phasing and scoping, site safety, and construction etiquette.
| | 3.4.22 Placer Regional Stormwater Coordinators Group Memorandum of Understanding | | Cathy Allen, Placer County Office of Education | October 2003 | 7 pages | | This memorandum of understanding is for cost sharing of certain portions of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System and the Municipal Small Separate Storm Sewer System, Phase II program.
| | 3.4.21b Environmental Challenges: Storm Water Update | | Cathy Allen, Placer County Office of Education | July 2005 | | | This update deals with the regional approach, minimum control measures, construction site storm water runoff controls, pollution prevention, monitoring and reporting.
| | 3.4.21a RFP Development and Regional Partnerships | | Cathy Allen, Placer County Office of Education | October 2003 | 13 pages | | The Placer County Office of Education provides a sample RFP for regional partnerships for storm water management plans.
| | 3.4.20 Partnering with Local Governments: Public Outreach and Education | | Mary Jane Foley, MJF Consulting and Ziad Mazboudi, City of San Juan Capistrano | October 2003 | 11 pages | | This presentation describes how local government can assist school districts in getting the word out on storm water pollution prevention.
| | 3.4.19 What Do Districts Need To Do First? | | John Oskoui, Long Beach Unified School District and Albert Leung, Los Angeles Unified School District | October 2003 | 12 pages | | A quick review of the MS4 Permit requirements including the storm water management program, the where, the what to do and notice of intent is presented here. | | 3.4.18 Storm Water Compliance Best Management Practices | | Donald Lussier, Corona-Norco Unified School District | October 2003 | 34 pages | | The Why, When, Where, How, and Who of storm water are dealt with here. The presentation includes best management practices (BMP's), public education and outreach, public involvement/participation, construction run off controls, and pollution prevention.
| | 3.4.17 Managing the Project Record | | Lettie Boggs, C.F.O. Colbi Technologies, Inc. | May 2003 | 8 pages | | This presentation describes how to set up accountability for construction project funding and expenditures. It includes project budget, monitoring expenditures, generating reports and securing trust of stakeholders. | | 3.4.16 Alternative Dispute Resolution | | Jim Patton, Patton and Associates | March 2003 | 2 pages | | An alternative method of solving conflicts for facilities team utilization is presented.
| | 3.4.15 Choosing a Project Inspector | | Sandy Pringle, Sandy Pringle Association | October 2002 | CASH Register Article | | The article suggests some of the things to think about when choosing a project inspector such as state requirements, DSA approval, the inspector’s career development, and references.
| | 3.4.14 Storm Water Regulation Acronyms and Definitions | | C.A.S.H. | July 2002 | 3 pages | | Storm Water Regulation Acronyms and Definitions | | 3.4.13 Summary of Storm Water Permit Changes | | Roger Chang, Los Angeles County Office of Education | July 2002 | 4 pages | | This summary highlights some of the major revisions to pending state and regional storm water permits and the projected impact of those changes on school and community college districts.
| | 3.4.12 A Lesson In Constructability 101 | | Stephanie L Dovichi, Pacific Program Management, Inc. | May 2002 | | | This article covers the who, what, when and how of a constructability review, a review of the plans and specifications to check for buildability and bidability.
| | 3.4.11 Passing The Baton From The Contractor To The District | | George Stoutenberg, EDGE Development Inc., and Dave Gallaher, Temecula Valley Unified School District | February 2002 | 6 pages | | The focus of this presentation is striking the optimum balance with M & O involvement in construction planning to ensure a professional, reliable and maintainable product/ school, in addition to getting the most from your contractor.
| | 3.4.10d Best Practices of the DSA Inspector: Expect More From Your IOR | | Stacey Veazey of Guideline Consulting and Recruiting, Inc. | March 2001 | 7 pages | | Interviewing Resources
This power point presentation covers the inspectors hiring process, recruitment, interviewing, determining soft skills, confirming qualifications, contract inclusion, certification, expectations and approval duties.
| | 3.4.10c Best Practices of the DSA Inspector: Expect More From Your IOR | | Len Metcalf, GKK Education; Kipp Gogosian, Dry Creek Elementary School District | March 2001 | 9 pages | | Design Phase
This power point presentation covers the inspectors hiring process, recruitment, interviewing, determining soft skills, confirming qualifications, contract inclusion, certification, expectations and approval duties.
| | 3.4.10b Best Practices of the DSA Inspector: Expect More From Your IOR | | Richard Conrad, Division of the State Architect (DSA) | March 2001 | 10 pages | | Project Inspector Construction Phase
This power point presentation covers the inspectors hiring process, recruitment, interviewing, determining soft skills, confirming qualifications, contract inclusion, certification, expectations and approval duties.
| | 3.4.10a Best Practices of the DSA Inspector: Expect More From Your IOR | | Len Metcalf, GKK Education; Kipp Gogosian, Dry Creek Elementary School District | March 2001 | 8 pages | | Hiring Process
This power point presentation covers the inspectors hiring process, recruitment, interviewing, determining soft skills, confirming qualifications, contract inclusion, certification, expectations and approval duties.
| | 3.4.09 Facilities Projects Management Structure | | William Savidge, Fremont Union High School District | March 2001 | 3 pages | | This presentation features a management structure that includes tracking, review, and approval process for modernization projects. | | 3.4.08 Request for Proposal (RFP) for Project and Construction Management Services | | William Savidge, Fremont Union High School District | March 2001 | | | A sample RFP for construction management services for district modernization projects is presented.
| | 3.4.07 School Construction News | | School Construction News Ezine | | Link to School Construction News Ezine | | This monthly newspaper for the School Construction Industry provides up to date information on school construction throughout the United States, especially California.
| | 3.4.06 Is Construction the Result of a Declared Disaster? | | Office of Emergency Services | | Link to Office of Emergency Services website | | If your district’s construction project is the result of an event that either the State of California or the Federal government has officially declared a “disaster”, you should contact the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (OES).
| | 3.4.05 Field Act Exemptions | | | 1 page | | Field Act Exemptions
| | 3.4.04 Elk Grove Project Closeout Procedures | | Elk Grove School District | May 1998 | 2 pages | | This form/check sheet outlines the required procedures before acceptance, during retention, and during occupancy. | | 3.4.03 DSA Closeout Checklist | | Riverside Unified School District, Operations Division | April 2000 | 1 page | | | 3.4.02 Contract Closeout Checklist | | Riverside Unified School District, Operations Division | April 2000 | 2 pages | | | 3.4.01 Owners Role During Construction | | William Schmidt, Director of Facilities, Palm Springs Unified School District | February 2000 | | |
|
|
